Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ulises Blanch vs Hamish Stewart Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Blanch vs Stewart analysis and find out who is favored!
Ulises Blanch vs Hamish Stewart Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Blanch 0 - 0 Stewart
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blanch has won 47.03% of points on his second serve, while Stewart has won 50.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blanch, in recent form, has won 55.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stewart has won 47.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.66% and 34.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Blanch has saved 67.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stewart has saved 63.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Blanch has won 62.86% of matches played (W/L 22/ 13), with Stewart winning 63.08% (W/L 41/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80). Stewart has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 35/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10), where as Stewart has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blanch has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.51 while Stewart has played against players with an average rank of 240.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blanch has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stewart has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Blanch has converted 37.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stewart has converted 36.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
501
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
490
Rank
478
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
53% (212-187)
Career Total W/L
66% (87-44)
77% (10-3)
YTD W/L
61% (17-11)
$54,150
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Hamish Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 77% (10/3) | 61% (17/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (20/11) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (156/139) | 54% (341/289) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.85 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 265 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 95 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:47 | 1:34:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 195 | 299.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (562/949) | 65% (1208/1858) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (415/562) | 75% (901/1208) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (182/387) | 51% (331/650) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (39/103) | 37% (75/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (378/956) | 39% (793/2036) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 67% (8/4) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 56% (9/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (10/13) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 20% (2/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 23% (13/3) |
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Robert Strombachs
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
15
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Luca Castagnola
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Matej Dodig
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Louis Dussin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamish Stewart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Hamish Stewart
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
40%
(
16 of
40)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
13
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Hamish Stewart
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Egor Gerasimov
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Hamish Stewart
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Hamish Stewart
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aristarkh Safonov
Player
Hamish Stewart
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Hamish Stewart
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
8
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Hamish Stewart
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
5
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Blanch Vs Stewart Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
